July 2, 2008
GL Matt
Just wanted to say a quick good luck to Matt Matros. He's going into the final table of the $1,500 NL WSOP event with 2nd place stack, and his competition is pretty much Random Donkey 1, Random Donkey 2, etc.
Take it down.
Posted by themaroon at 6:40 PM | Comments ()
June 17, 2008
Funny NL Hand
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (9 handed)
MP2 ($291.90)
MP3 ($381.30)
CO (Pity Flop) ($186.55)
Hero ($399.60)
SB ($128.40)
BB ($17)
UTG ($204.85)
UTG+1 ($213.60)
MP1 ($175.40)
Preflop: Hero is Button with Kc, Ah.
5 folds, CO (Pity Flop) calls $2, Hero raises to $9, 2 folds, CO (Pity Flop) raises to $18, Hero calls $7.
Flop: ($37) Jh, Qd, 2c (2 players)
Pity Flop checks, Hero checks.
Turn: ($37) 8h (2 players)
Pity Flop checks, Hero checks.
River: ($37) Th (2 players)
Pity Flop bets $35, Hero raises to $383.6 (All-In), Pity Flop calls $135.55 (All-In).
Final Pot: $378.10
Pity Flop doesn't show (Qs Qc).
Hero has Kc Ah (straight, ace high).
Outcome: Hero wins $591.15.
Nice play donkey. Good to be at the easy tables again.
Posted by themaroon at 3:04 AM | Comments ()
June 10, 2008
WSOP 2008
I'm out in Vegas. The family was headed out here this weekend, and I had a good offer at Caesars and the WSOP is going on so I thought I'd sneak out for a few days. I head back Wednesday.
I haven't played much live action yet. A little satellite action at the Rio has been about it. Just enough to make me remember why I don't really care so much for live poker really. I may play the $2k limit event tomorrow, I haven't really decided yet. Limit events are huge EV for me, since they're largely full of guys who are good at NL and don't really understand the difference.
In fact, I was talking with a few other guys and everyone agreed that you're more concerned about random people at a limit event than the better NL tournament players. A random Joe who buys into a $2k limit event might just be a winning $30/$60 player, but if Phil Hellmuth sits down, you know you've got an easy spot. And please don't tell me about how many limit hold'em bracelets he has. He got them mostly when the tournaments were full of 70 people as clueless as him.
I've spent a decent amount of time out here playing online in my room. I've become quite the no-limit soldier lately, playing a little low stakes here and there. I don't have much time to devote to it, so in a good week I might get in 1,000 hands total (5-6 hours of play) but I feel like I'm learning. I never really spent much time playing NL ring games, and I still don't feel I'm great at them by any means. I'm clearly good enough to beat the low stakes (a well-trained chimpanzee would be) but beyond that, probably not so much. I'll get there though, one 60 minute session at a time.
It's fun being at the donkey tables again. It's been a long time for me. Those tables where nobody has a clue, and having just read one book makes you probably the best player you'll encounter, they're a blast to play. I hear you start running into some decent players at $3/$6, but before that it's all pretty much gravy.
I did read this book which I think is, for the most part, pretty good. There isn't much in there I didn't already know, and there are a few things I don't agree with, but for the most part the logic is pretty solid. And it's thought-provoking enough in parts to be worth the read. I'll call it the best no-limit hold'em book I've read, but its only real competition is Harrington on Hold'em, which was more tournament focused and was pretty much a steaming pile even at that.
I have to say, I'm loving Poker Tracker 3. They integrated it with Poker Ace and Postgres (no more installing that separately) and now it just works entirely out of the box .Even comes with a 60 day free trial. And it doesn't say "Not Responding" every time it does anything. It seems to be a lot faster and more responsive, so I can't find any reason to not recommend upgrading.
I also got to spend a little time with Richard and a player named Kyle Ray (KPR16 online). It was interesting talking about limit hold'em again. I've been out of the loop for so long. It reminded me of the arguments I used to have with a lot of the 2+2 crowd about preflop play. It sounds as if consensus there has shifted greatly toward my viewpoint. It also sounds like limit games have therefore become a lot tougher. Bad beat.
I've realized that I miss poker. I don't so much miss playing it for a living, and still have no desire to jump back into that. But I miss competing at something. Startups are fun, but they aren't really competitive. They sort of are, in their own way, but the competition isn't truly ever resolved because the variance is so high and the sample size so low. Also they aren't zero sum, which makes it different, and largely (though not entirely) less interesting.
So it's nice to just be playing again. It's like the early days, when I was just playing $3/$6 with my friends, learning the ropes, getting better, and making a little money in the process. Most of all, having fun.
Which reminds me, I need to wrap up part 3 of a previous series…
Posted by themaroon at 1:57 AM | Comments ()
May 24, 2008
New Project
I think I'm going to elance up a poker project I've had kicking around in my noggin for a couple years now. It's the sort of thing I would have killed for as an online poker player, and I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be interested in it. It's also the sort of project that I think lends itself well to outsourcing, as it's not too complex (though probably time consuming) and easy to split up and verify if all of the pieces are working independently.
But I need your help. What I need is hand histories from the major sites, and you guys still play poker, right? If you'd be so kind as to send me a small sample (to matt@ for this domain, or just click the link top left) from any of the various sites you play at, I would really appreciate it. I'm only interested in Hold'em and Omaha hands for now. You can send me a whole file from a session, or just cut and paste a few individual hands. Either way is great by me.
In return for doing so, other than my undying gratitude, you'll be among the first to get a sneak peak at the new site when it's ready. And if it makes me a billionaire and I write my memoirs, I'll thank you in the acknowledgements. (It likely won't even make me a thousandaire, so don't hold your breath, but consider it a freeroll.)
Mostly, though, you'll get to use a cool new app for poker players for free and before the general public. In fact if I ever decide to charge for it, you'll get at least a few months of free service, and maybe a lifetime if you're extra helpful.
Posted by themaroon at 4:04 AM | Comments ()
May 23, 2008
How To Play Poker, The Bear Stearns Way
I was reading a poker book today, and came across the following quote on the topic of risk management:
Commercial banks make money by managing risk. They solicit deposits in savings and checking accounts. Then they lend these deposits out to others at a higher interest rate and pocket the difference.
You can tell that was written more than a year ago. It's been a while since anyone used banks as an example of good risk management. Nowadays that chapter might continue:
Many of the people to whom they lend those deposits have poor credit histories and/or low incomes. Loans to these risky borrowers, called subprime, are then rolled together into massive portfolios and sliced into tranches which get repaid in descending order from senior to equity. They then package them into shares, called collateralized debt obligations, and trick the credit rating companies (which isn't a very hard task) into rating the top tranches as investment grade.
Because the loans were made as adjustable rate mortgages with an initial discount to people who were already struggling to make their monthly payments, banks and other holders of CDOs leave themselves exposed to massive foreclosures as interest rates rise or the economy slows.
The poker lesson here? Just keep going all-in. Works every time but one.
Posted by themaroon at 2:25 AM | Comments ()
May 20, 2008
Legalization: Players and Sites
Legalization of poker will benefit players immensely. As I mentioned in the first post, it will mean an order of magnitude more players than we've ever seen before. If you think the last poker bubble was big, be prepared for 5 or 10 times that.
The poker community is a giant food chain. Players, for the most part, start out at the bottom and, as they improve, move their way up the pyramid. Maybe they start off playing $1/$2 or $2/$4 online, and then after they perceive they're winning (which is easy to do in poker even if you aren't) or get used to the stakes, they start working their way up the ladder.
The problem in recent years (in fact, to some extent, ever since online poker's inception) is that it has been the bottom of the food chain that the law has succeeded in keeping off of the sites. These are the guys who just want to blow off a little steam and gamble away some money because it's much more fun than saving. They saw poker on TV or played it with their friends and want to give competitive poker a shot. But if it's too much hassle (i.e. their credit cards don't work) they'll just go buy some lottery tickets instead. They don't care that much, they just want to piss away money because they're Americans or Brits and it makes them feel good to know that they can.
So some of them are willing to jump through all of the hoops rather than blowing their money at a casino or on scratch off tickets or betting on the Jets (or Arsenal) with their friendly neighborhood bookie. And some of them start to play regularly and get used to the stakes, and maybe a few even become winners, and a few more get lucky enough for long enough to convince themselves that they did too. And all the while, every guy winning at $2/$4 is eyeing the $3/$6 game, because who wants to win $20 an hour when they can win $30? And the guys playing $3/$6 are eyeing the $5/$10 game, because who wants to win $30 an hour when they can win $50? It may not be their livelihood (though many quickly start considering making it that) but everyone wants to make more than they do if possible. It's the American way.
Poker is not a true food chain because there's nothing stopping a rich guy from starting off at $50/$100, but it's close enough that it functions like one. So the casual players at the lowest limits provide the same service to the rest of the community that algae does to a lake. They feed the small fish, who in turn feed the medium fish, who then feed the pike. And just like a lake, if you cut down on the algae, you end up with fewer pike. It takes a while for each level of the chain to starve in turn, but it happens, and it has happened ever since the UIGEA (though I'm told some recent advances in payment processing have helped a bit lately, but it won't last). You can see it in the numbers and feel it when you talk to the players.
What happened between the beginning of the boom and the start of the bust is that the algae exploded. It was a pain to get money on, but there were still more sites advertising on more television shows and in more magazines, and there were more funding options, so a larger percentage of the casual players heard about it and made their way through the filter. And the small fish population grew along with the algae, and the medium fish along with the small, and so on up the food chain.
That's why every few months sites were offering bigger limits. When I first started playing online, $10/$20 limit was the max and no-limit didn't even exist yet. But then poker took off and the algae bloomed and the bluegill population did too. The bass population started growing so $15/$30, $20/$40, and $30/$60 games started appearing. The algae kept growing, as did the bluegill and the bass, and so the pike started multiplying too, and suddenly every $30/$60 game was full, and $100/$200 games were going off around the clock. Some sites were offering stakes bordering on ludicrous. Where once $25 tournaments were the maximum, $215 tournaments ran every day. Prize pools went from hundreds to hundreds of thousands.
And when the UIGEA hit it all started to evaporate. There were a few massive shocks, like when Party Poker pulled out of the market. Action didn't increase that much elsewhere and the site, which lost 85% of its customer base, was still in a not too distant 2nd place. That's how big it was before, and most of that action was completely gone. Then Neteller left the market (locking up a lot of player money for many months) and things started getting even worse.
The effect rippled through the casino world too. Tournaments, which were fed by online qualifiers and people who won big online tournaments, have since experienced a gradual decline in entrants. Even the WSOP had fewer than the year before (almost a third) which hadn't happened in as long as anybody could remember.
But the UIGEA is just a dam, and behind that there's a river full of algae, entirely unmolested, waiting to pour forth. And that will be the immediate consequence of regulation. Every publicly traded gaming corporation, and even some non-gaming ones (like Yahoo, who dabbles in poker overseas) will apply for licensing at the first possible opportunity. Massive advertising budgets will saturate the internet and the airwaves with poker ads. Ad sources like Google and television, which stopped taking online gaming ads after the Discovery Networks debacle, will open back up.
It's debatable what will happen with the credit card situation, but fraud prevention is a lot better than it was 8 years ago when issuing banks first started rejecting gaming-related deposits. At the very worst players will fund accounts with PayPal or something similar. You may even be able to buy prepaid PokerStars cards at BestBuy just like you can for Wii Points or iTunes credits. Why not?
New sites will sprout like weeds, but just like the last boom, the vast majority of them will perish. In fact, if you look at the top few sites today, it's almost the same names that existed in 2001, before anyone outside of the small community had ever even heard of Phil Ivey. Party Poker, Poker Stars, Ultimate Bet. The only exception is Full Tilt, which found a rather unique competitive advantage by licensing pretty much everyone who ever won a televised event.
Full Tilt has a stranglehold on that particular angle, but a few sites will pop up that have their own unique advantages. Harrah's will probably become a major contender, given their current customer base and ownership of the WSOP brand. Yahoo might be a serious contender given their reach. Maybe a few more will pop up along those lines.
But for the most part, it will be the same 5 or 10 sites we all use now. Poker has a very strong network effect, meaning that the value of a poker site increases exponentially as its user base grows. A site with twice as many players is four times as valuable. So the new players will look around and land at the sites that already have the old players. PokerStars will probably still be the biggest, and they deserve it because they're clearly the best in almost every respect. Party Poker will likely make a strong comeback in the U.S., because they're brilliant at marketing and most of us old-timers have some fond memories of juicy $30/$60 games and ridiculously large cashouts there.
Sites will probably go through some growing pains. It's not trivial to scale to 5-10x your current size, especially that quickly. Sites, newly flush with revenues, will become hacker targets and DDoS attacks will flourish once again. While I'm sure they've never stopped, I'm told they've been greatly reduced since 2003, when Party Poker was being knocked out almost every night due to a combination of that and their own poor planning.
Some sites will buckle and take player funds down with them, as has always happened, but most will be reputable, and, at least for a couple years players and sites will be rolling in the green.
Posted by themaroon at 6:57 PM | Comments ()
May 18, 2008
WSOP 2008
I was looking at the WSOP schedule and saw this for the main event:
54A
Thursday, July 3, 2008
12 Noon
No-Limit Hold'em World Championship Day 1A
$10,00054B
Friday, July 4, 2008
12 Noon
Day 1B54C
Saturday, July 5, 2008
12 Noon
Day 1C54D
Sunday, July 6, 2008
12 Noon
Day 1DMonday, July 7, 2008
All Day
BreakTuesday, July 8, 2008
12 Noon
Day 2AWednesday, July 9, 2008
12 Noon
Day 2BThursday, July 10, 2008
12 Noon
Day 3Friday, July 11, 2008
12 Noon
Day 4Saturday, July 12, 2008
12 Noon
Day 5Sunday, July 13, 2008
12 Noon
Day 6Monday, July 14, 2008
12 Noon
Day 7
How does this make any sense at all? You have the 4 Day 1s, then a break. Then the 2 Day 2s with no break, then Day 3. This is retarded.
It should go ABCD for day ones, immediately followed by A+B and then C+D for day 2s. Then a break.
As it stands, anyone in the second day 2 is at a serious disadvantage. I don't know how they are determining it, but if it's based on when you played the first day, and you have a choice of that, it's very much to your advantage to aim for the earlier one.
In my last WSOP, my first day was so long and so grueling that I went straight home and fell asleep in the shower. Day 2 was better, since they had overshot day 1 and cut it down. But I still relished the day off afterward.
Not that you shouldn't be prepared to play multiple long days in a row if you buy into the WSOP Main Event. But you shouldn't have to do this if half of your opponents don't. I don't think there's a big difference between having one day off or two, but there is a huge difference between zero and one.
Also, and this may come as a shocker to many people who read this blog, people have jobs. I mean, getting away for two weeks is hard. My guess is most of the entrants in that tournament take one week off and figure that if they make it to the second, they've earned enough cash to risk pissing off their boss.
Either way, it's an inconvenience to them, so let them play day 2, since they're on average something like 85% likely to have been eliminated by the end of it. Then have the day off.
The way its structured, someone can make it through day 5 without risking missing a second work week. Day 6 is a Sunday, so if you've made it to that point, you're canceling your return ticket. You're probably also in the six figure prize pool, so you don't mind the change fee.
I also don't think I care for the 4 month delay before the final table. I understand the intent and all. But if they're going to delay it that much for television, why not at least broadcast it live and make a huge spectacle out of it. If they can live cast a golf tournament, I don't know why they couldn't do so for poker. Put it on a Thursday so it doesn't compete with football and you might have yourself some ratings.
Posted by themaroon at 12:48 AM | Comments ()
May 7, 2008
Legalization
I've been thinking about the future of online poker a decent amount lately. There's a pretty big push for making it legal, and there's even a bill in the house that would work toward that. I don't know if it will pass or not, but the poker sites finally have the lobbying arm they should have years ago. I even suggested that to Party Poker on one of their cruises long, long ago and Vikrant Barghava said they didn't need to because the US would "just ignore online poker forever." Their share price tells me he was wrong.
Between the PPA, the World Trade Organization, where the Europeans may soon follow Antigua's lead in claiming that our policies are unfair and a violation of the treaty (which has been deemed true), and the lack of banking regulations which were called for by the UIGEA and should have been in place months ago, it seems like there's a good chance that it will become regulated.
So what will it mean for poker if it does? Quite a bit actually.
It's sort of an axiom in the startup world that every hoop you make a user jump through in order to use your site reduces the amount of people who actually do so by some percentage. This should be pretty obvious. The exact percentage depends on the hurdle. Sites like Digg have millions of readers, tens of thousands of commenters, and thousands of submitters, because each step requires more effort than the previous (with just signing up an account being the largest). I vaguely remember reading that in the early days of PayPal they discovered that each new step they introduced caused 30% of people to give up. That's enormous. To put that another way, eliminating one step would grow their signup rate by nearly 50%.
Online poker, almost since its inception, has been besieged with hurdles preventing a new player from playing. To play at a site you have to do the following things:
- Go to the website and download the software. (There are web based versions, but not many, and they suck.)
- Install.
- Create your account. Input user name, password, email address.
- Verify your email address.
- Input all necessary information for a real money account. Address, phone number, etc., some of which may have to be verified by a phone call or a code in the mail.
- Input checking account and routing number.
- Wait a few days for the site to EFT a small deposit into your account.
- Check your bank statement to see what the deposits were.
- Input them into the poker site.
- Fund poker account.
- Wait a few days for the e-check to clear.
And that's all assuming you knew right away that they wouldn't accept your credit card. Step number 6 for most people is to try the credit card functionality in the cashier and get rejected.
It's been that way for a very long time. Back in 2000, when I first started playing online, the high chargeback rate had already caused almost every credit card issuer to stop accepting online gaming transactions. There's been a cat and mouse game over that for the last 8 years, with payment processors tricking the banks, who found out and cut them off, at which point they closed down and opened a new corporation and did it again. It goes on and on, but the banks have always had the upper hand and 95% of the time your credit card was getting rejected.
Also, that was just the procedure for one site. Most people added an extra step in and went with Neteller so they could then play at any site. Back when I started playing PayPal was the method of choice, but that changed around the time of the eBay acquisition.
There's also the legal hurdle. A lot of people think playing online poker is illegal, even though in most states it is not. I've met a number of people who were deterred by that. That should almost be a step in the above chain.
So if the UIGEA becomes legal, and steps 6-11 (plus the two pseudo-steps) get replaced by one credit card or PayPal transaction, I think we're going to see an order of magnitude more players than ever before.
Over my next few posts, I'm going to examine how I think this will affect the poker economy. I'll talk about the following groups:
- Sites (current and future)
- Players
- Ancillary Services Providers (like myself)
- Live poker and events
Stay tuned.
Posted by themaroon at 12:42 AM | Comments ()
April 1, 2008
Poker PC
Someone not too long ago asked me what I thought they should look for in a computer for playing poker online. It got me thinking. I realized I've learned quite a bit about that over the last 6 years or so, and that the information might help a lot of you, so here are my thoughts. I'm going to go more in-depth here and talk about the entire office, because there are other things just as important as the pc.
If you're a good player and playing for a living (or for a serious percentage thereof) a good home office isn't a luxury, it's an investment. And if you're good at poker, budget isn't really a concern for you. So I'm going to just assume that price is no real object, but that you're also not looking to spend just for the sake of spending.
First I should start with the setup. Buy the best office chair you can. I bought an Aeron, and it's the most comfortable chair in my house. Unless you count the ones in my car (and if anyone can tell me how to make a Lexus seat into an office chair, I'm all ears) it's probably the most comfortable I've ever sat in. I used to play in a very nice leather recliner, then in a reclining couch, but switching to an Aeron was the best thing I ever did. The reclining tended to make me tired, and caused back pains after very long stretches.
Aerons are the gold standard when it comes to office chairs, and they charge for it. It will run you about $1k new. You can find them on Craigslist used for half that, though if you go that route, be sure to go to a store first and find the right size for you. They aren't one size fits all like the crap you buy at Staples, so make sure you get the right one.
Even used that's a pretty damn expensive chair, but consider that even a mediocre $5/$10 player makes that back in 20 hours (on average of course) and that you're going to be sitting in the thing a hell of a lot. It will save you so many aches and pains that you'll probably work more just for owning it, so it will pay for itself many times over. And it will last forever. I've had mine for about 3 years, and have driven it across the country twice, and it's still almost as good as new.
As for a desk, who really cares? Get something made of sturdy wood since it will be holding a decent amount of weight in monitors (I'll get into that in a minute). IKEA sells passable ones for $50. There's a saying in the startup world that applies to any home office: "Always buy the cheapest tables and the most expensive chairs."
I recommend some stand lamps for your room if it's not very well-lit already. You'll reduce eyestrain by keeping your monitor's brightness down and the rest of the room's brightness up. I did this by replacing the bulbs in my ceiling fixture with compact fluorescents. Since your fixtures can only support a limited wattage (75-100 being typical) CFLs give you much more light (a 40w CFL is equivalent to a 150w incandescent) and save you money since they're going to be on a lot.
Get a good wired mouse. I'd search Amazon for a gaming mouse and buy whatever is highest rated. There's nothing worse than having a battery die on you while you're playing 4 tables, and if you have a wireless mouse, this will happen to you at some point. Keyboards don't really matter, you can play just fine if it runs out of juice. I'm rather partial to my Logitech DiNovo Edge (especially since it has a backup mouse) but that's neither here nor there.
Get redundant internet connections. I like to keep my cable company's highest speed internet as my primary line. If you have telephone service you can probably get their cheapest DSL as a backup for something $10-$15 a month. If, like me, you don't have a landline, get an EVDO USB adapter from Verizon or Sprint, or set your PC up to use your phone's tethering (much cheaper, and very good quality if you have a Motorola Q). If you're playing bigger stakes this only has to save you from timing out once every few months to pay for itself. It will. You don't realize how much your internet goes down until you work a job where it costs you hundreds (or more) every time it does.
If you go with cable and DSL you obviously will have two networks. If you can, have your primary one wired as it will save you some headache. Remember that with technology, each step in the chain is just one more place for something to fail, and wireless routers/cards are somewhat unreliable. If wired isn't an option, just get two wireless routers. It doesn't really matter which, the cheapo Linksys WRT54G that's in damn near every home in America will suffice. Password protect your internet using WPA, like you would any home network.
Get as many uninterrupted power supply (UPS) systems as you need. These are basically like surge protectors with a built-in battery. When a power outage occurs they'll keep things running. Be sure to plug your cable/DSL modems, switches, routers, etc. into the battery protected ports. Also plug in your PC and monitors. I once played a tournament for 3 hours (on a laptop) during a blackout. The UPSes will pay for themselves the first time the power goes out while you're playing. If you're using the setup I'm about to recommend you might only have 15 minutes or so, but that's enough to play until the blinds and then close all of your tables without a disconnect.
Note that all of the redundancy I recommend to avoid disconnects is less important if you play limit games, where you are typically just put all-in. If you play no-limit (which often has a no-disconnect protection policy) it's extremely important, as a power outage could cost you a lot of money. In fact, you theoretically gain a little edge over people who don't have that.
So we've got a great chair, a cheap table, lighting, and enough redundant internet and power that it's pretty much going to take a hurricane to force us to disconnect. And other than the chair, we've only spent a couple hundred bucks. Now let's blow some real cash.
First the PC. You're using PokerTracker/Poker Ace, so that means Windows. (I don't know if you can run PT with Postgres and PA using Parallels on a Mac, but I'd guess it would be a nightmare at best.) What version of Windows doesn't really matter, but you're probably going to be using Vista, so I'd recommend either Home Premium or Ultimate. Not for any poker related reasons, just in general.
I'm going to recommend a desktop as well, because PT/PA can be resource hogs, and we're going to want a workhorse and a couple big monitors to match. As far as desktop OEMs go, I like HP. Their products usually hold up better than Dell's, cost about the same, and have better service. You could buy any brand of computer though, so feel free to shop around. What you are looking for is:
Core 2 Quad processor. I've heard the new version of PT is threaded. Either way, like I said, PT/PA hog a surprising amount of resources, so horsepower is important.
4GB RAM minimum. More is better (though price increases exponentially after this) but don't go under 4, especially on Vista.
Discrete graphics card with 2 DVI/VGA ports. Don't get anything integrated, because we're connecting 2 monitors at high resolution and trust me, you don't want to go there with some turd Intel video chip that shares memory. You don't need a high-end gamer card at all because frame rates aren't a concern, so just get the cheapest one with 512mb and you'll be fine. I'm guessing most cards with 256mb would do as well, but I don't know for sure and the price difference is generally only $40.
Fastest hard drive possible. You don't really care about storage much, as poker hands don't take up much room in the old DB. But I've run PT/PA on a 5,400 rpm drive and it was brutal. Don't settle for less than 7,200 rpm, and if you can find one with a 10k rpm drive (and short of a very expensive gamer PC I don't know that you can) you're golden.
Best of all may be to get a computer with a RAID 1 (also referred to as mirrored) array. These are commonly available even in lower-end PCs now. I don't know how much performance increase you'll get from the increased read speed, but it's probably something, and it definitely won't slow you down. And you have protection from hard drive failure.
Either way, also get an external HD (or maybe one of those personal media drive thingies if you buy an HP) and buy Norton Ghost to backup your pc onto it. You should do this with any computer that has stuff on it you care about, and you definitely do not want to lose years of PT data. Hard drives fail. Trust me. I learned the hard way. And though a RAID helps guard against hard drive failure, that isn't the only way to lose data.
Get a built in 802.11b/g card. Most of the rest of the PC-related stuff doesn't matter. Sound cards, speakers, DVD drives, etc. Whatever you want there.
Now for monitors. I recommend 2 24" LCDs. HP's monitors are generally awesome. Do not buy Dells. I don't know about their current generation of monitors, but the old ones had awful brightness controls and won't let you turn it down far enough. HP does a pretty good job there. I bought 2 of their 23" models 3 or 4 years ago and still love them.
The reason I like ones so big is that they have resolution of 1,920x1,200. A poker table is natively 800x600, meaning you can run 4 on one screen with no overlap. The second monitor allows you to play another 4 if you wish (though I generally don't recommend that many tables). I usually use it for PT/PA and AIM, Rhapsody, Outlook, whatever.
True, you could get smaller screens and resize now that most good poker rooms finally have caught up to the same technology every other program had in 1991. But if anything, I'd like my tables to be bigger. I'm all about preserving my vision.
I priced the PC and 2 monitors at about $2,300 on HP.com. Toss in the chair, etc, and you're looking at $3,000-$3,500 (depending on if you buy the chair new or used). It's not a cheap setup, but it will pay for itself many times over.
Anything I left out?
Posted by themaroon at 10:48 PM | Comments ()
March 19, 2008
Rakeback Update
I've gone ahead and paid rakeback for last month. Most of you probably already noticed it, but for those who didn't, it got there a couple days ago. I pretty much realized that there is no way Full Tilt is going to make things right with me. And legal action doesn't really seem sensible. So, I decided my best course of action was to just accept the payment and pay my people out, minimizing the disruption to the customers they haven't stolen, which I did.
That said, I'm going to put a little effort into signing up anyone else who takes Americans. I'm really interested in hearing what sites you guys would like to play at. Does anyone trust Absolute Poker anymore? What about Ultimate Bet? Cake Poker appears to be popular amongst other rakeback sites, does anyone play there?
Back to working on Part 3 of my series.
Posted by themaroon at 12:27 AM | Comments ()
If you are playing poker and don't have a rakeback deal yet, check out rakerebatereview.com. Amongst other poker rooms they offer Inter Poker rakeback and BetOnBet VIP bonus. Make sure to get a rakeback deal today.
